# Why is a NumPy int not an instance of a Python int, but a NumPy float is an instance of a Python float?

• A+
Category：Languages

Consider the following:

``>>> import numbers >>> import numpy >>> a = numpy.int_(0) >>> isinstance(a, int) False >>> isinstance(a, numbers.Integral) True >>> b = numpy.float_(0) >>> isinstance(b, float) True >>> isinstance(b, numbers.Real) True ``

NumPy's `numpy.int_` and `numpy.float_` types are both in Python's numeric abstract base class hierarchy, but it is strange to me that a `np.int_` object is not an instance of the built-in `int` class, while a `np.float_` object is an instance of the built-in `float` type.

Why is this the case?

Python integers can be arbitrary length: `type(10**1000)` is still `int`, and will print out a one and then a thousand zeros on your screen if you output it.

Numpy `int64` (which is what `int_` is on my machine) are integers represented by 8 bytes (64 bits), and anything over that cannot be represented. For example, `np.int_(10)**1000` will give you a wrong answer - but quickly ;).

Thus, they are different kinds of numbers; subclassing one under the other makes as much sense as subclassing `int` under `float` would, is what I assume `numpy` people thought. It is best to keep them separate, so that no-one is confused about the fact that it would be unwise to confuse them.

The split is done because arbitrary-size integers are slow, while `numpy` tries to speed up computation by sticking to machine-friendly types.

On the other hand, floating point is the standard IEEE floating point, both in Python and in `numpy`, supported out-of-the-box by our processors.