Efficient random generator for very large range (in python)

  • A+
Category:Languages

I am trying to create a generator that returns numbers in a given range that pass a particular test given by a function foo. However I would like the numbers to be tested in a random order. The following code will achieve this:

from random import shuffle  def MyGenerator(foo, num):     order = list(range(num))     shuffle(order)     for i in order:         if foo(i):             yield i 

The Problem

The problem with this solution is that sometimes the range will be quite large (num might be of the order 10**8 and upwards). This function can become slow, having such a large list in memory. I have tried to avoid this problem, with the following code:

from random import randint      def MyGenerator(foo, num):     tried = set()     while len(tried) <= num - 1:         i = randint(0, num-1)         if i in tried:             continue         tried.add(i)         if foo(i):             yield i 

This works well most of the time, since in most cases num will be quite large, foo will pass a reasonable number of numbers and the total number of times the __next__ method will be called will be relatively small (say, a maximum of 200 often much smaller). Therefore its reasonable likely we stumble upon a value that passes the foo test and the size of tried never gets large. (Even if it only passes 10% of the time, we wouldn't expect tried to get larger than about 2000 roughly.)

However, when num is small (close to the number of times that the __next__ method is called, or foo fails most of the time, the above solution becomes very inefficient - randomly guessing numbers until it guesses one that isn't in tried.

My attempted solution...

I was hoping to use some kind of function that maps the numbers 0,1,2,..., n onto themselves in a roughly random way. (This isn't being used for any security purposes and so doesn't matter if it isn't the most 'random' function in the world). The function here (Create a random bijective function which has same domain and range) maps signed 32-bit integers onto themselves, but I am not sure how to adapt the mapping to a smaller range. Given num I don't even need a bijection on 0,1,..num just a value of n larger than and 'close' to num (using whatever definition of close you see fit). Then I can do the following:

def mix_function_factory(num):     # something here???     def foo(index):         # something else here??     return foo  def MyGenerator(foo, num):     mix_function = mix_function_factory(num):     for i in range(num):         index = mix_function(i)         if index <= num:             if foo(index):                 yield index 

(so long as the bijection isn't on a set of numbers massively larger than num the number of times index <= num isn't True will be small).

My Question

Can you think of one of the following:

  • A potential solution for mix_function_factory or even a few other potential functions for mix_function that I could attempt to generalise for different values of num?
  • A better way of solving the original problem?

Many thanks in advance....


The problem is basically generating a random permutation of the integers in the range 0..n-1.

Luckily for us, these numbers have a very useful property: they all have a distinct value modulo n. If we can apply some mathemical operations to these numbers while taking care to keep each number distinct modulo n, it's easy to generate a permutation that appears random. And the best part is that we don't need any memory to keep track of numbers we've already generated, because each number is calculated with a simple formula.


Examples of operations we can perform on every number x in the range include:

  • Addition: We can add any integer c to x.
  • Multiplication: We can multiply x with any number m that shares no prime factors with n.

Applying just these two operations on the range 0..n-1 already gives quite satisfactory results:

>>> n = 7 >>> c = 1 >>> m = 3 >>> [((x+c) * m) % n for x in range(n)] [3, 6, 2, 5, 1, 4, 0] 

Looks random, doesn't it?

If we generate c and m from a random number, it'll actually be random, too. But keep in mind that there is no guarantee that this algorithm will generate all possible permutations, or that each permutation has the same probability of being generated.


Implementation

The difficult part about the implementation is really just generating a suitable random m. I used the prime factorization code from this answer to do so.

import random  # credit for prime factorization code goes # to https://stackoverflow.com/a/17000452/1222951 def prime_factors(n):     gaps = [1,2,2,4,2,4,2,4,6,2,6]     length, cycle = 11, 3     f, fs, next_ = 2, [], 0     while f * f <= n:         while n % f == 0:             fs.append(f)             n /= f         f += gaps[next_]         next_ += 1         if next_ == length:             next_ = cycle     if n > 1: fs.append(n)     return fs  def generate_c_and_m(n, seed=None):     # we need to know n's prime factors to find a suitable multiplier m     p_factors = set(prime_factors(n))      def is_valid_multiplier(m):         # m must not share any prime factors with n         factors = prime_factors(m)         return not p_factors.intersection(factors)      # if no seed was given, generate random values for c and m     if seed is None:         c = random.randint(n)         m = random.randint(1, 2*n)     else:         c = seed         m = seed      # make sure m is valid     while not is_valid_multiplier(m):         m += 1      return c, m 

Now that we can generate suitable values for c and m, creating the permutation is trivial:

def random_range(n, seed=None):     c, m = generate_c_and_m(n, seed)      for x in range(n):         yield ((x + c) * m) % n 

And your generator function can be implemented as

def MyGenerator(foo, num):     for x in random_range(num):         if foo(x):             yield x 

Comment

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen: