Will specialization of function templates in std for program-defined types no longer be allowed in C++20?

  • A+
Category:Languages

Quote from cppreference.com:

Adding template specializations

It is allowed to add template specializations for any standard library |class (since C++20)| template to the namespace std only if the declaration depends on at least one program-defined type and the specialization satisfies all requirements for the original template, except where such specializations are prohibited.

Does it mean, that starting from C++20, adding specializations of function templates from std namespaces for user-defined types will be no longer allowed? If so, it implies that many pieces of existing code can break, doesn't it? (It seems to me to be kind-of a "radical" change.) Moreover, it will inject into such codes undefined behavior, which will not trigger compilations errors (warnings hopefully will).

 


Not really that radical. This change is based on this paper from Walter E. Brown. The paper goes into rationale rather deeply, but ultimately it boils down to this:

  1. Specialization of function templates is rather poor as a customization point. Overloading and ADL are much better in that regard. There are other customization points discussed in the paper as well.
  2. The standard library doesn't rely on this poor customization point too much already.
  3. The wording change that's put into place actually permits adding entire declarations to namespace std (not just specializations) where it's explicitly permitted. So now there are better customization points.

Given #1 and #2, it's rather unlikely existing code will break. Or at least, not enough for this to be a major problem. Code that used auto and register also "broke" in the past, but that minuscule amount of C++ code didn't stop progress.

Comment

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen: