Consider:This compiles and prints the first parameter... but I have doubts whether it is actually "legal" / well-formed. I know that the initializer list should initialize variables in order of their declaration in the class, lest you reference variables that haven't been initialized yet. But what about member variables not...
I'm confused about why the two functions below involving Nothing are different:The first one has type:
Sorry for for the potentially silly question. But this seems to be a stumping problem I just can't find the answer to.
How do I convert the below Haskell do notation to the bind (>>=) notation?I am a Haskell beginner with decent knowledge and I tried something like
I have:I want to declare the state variable as well.Is there a way to destructure this without breaking it into two statements?
Extremely new to c++ however have a question regarding templatesSuppose I have a simple template class as defined below:
I am trying to create a generator that returns numbers in a given range that pass a particular test given by a function foo. However I would like the numbers to be tested in a random order. The following code will achieve this:
I have an HTML structure like this:There are actually 10 tile rows and 10 tiles per row. I'm styling with the following sass:
Suppose I have a multi-level dictionary like this I'd like to access it like thisWhat I have so far is
I want to test every possible valid input to a program I wrote. It accepts 32-bit values. So how would I write a loop to generate all the inputs from 0x0 to 0xffffffff? I'm unsure how I would increment the value (it wouldn't be incremented by 1, right?)