I have 100 structs that look something like this:I want to find the largest sizeof from among these structs at compile time. I tried using a comparison macro like this:
Related to questions How do I check for C++11 support? and What is the value of __cplusplus for C++17?
I want to create a macro that replaces all calls to printf, more specifically mbedtls_printf (which behaves the exact sameway as printf) with nothing.
I am trying to practise creating macros in Common Lisp by creating a simple += macro and an iterate macro. I have managed to create the += macro easily enough and I am using it within my iterate macro, which I am having a couple of issues with. When I...
This is another case of trying to get rid of a macro. Consider(Imagine f_() gets data form a .foo file or uses hard-coded "dummy" values, g_() does the same for .bar.) There might be a function to decide which overload to call:
How do I know whether I'm calling an anaphoric macro? If I do so without knowing it, some seemingly unbound symbols might behave quite different from what one would expect.
There is a C structureI have made changes to the code likeNow, usage of val2 in the other C files is like a_obj->val2; I want to replace it's declaration usage and there are a lot of them so I have defined a macro in the header file where the struct...
I'm playing around with clojure macros and I'm finding that a lot of macro behavior I can just replicate with function composition.
I read that #defining and #undefining inside a block is a code smell. Why is that? Also, I see that in the code(just a sample that shows what I have in the actual code), this compiles,
Below is the small program:And the output of the program is:Can anyone help me to understand why the sizeof(max) is 4 bytes?