Below code results in undefined behaviour, if used as is:Traditional approach is to fix it with std::mutex:
Languages
Languages
Languages
How to implement thread-safe container with natural syntactic sugar?
Below code results in undefined behaviour, if used as is:Traditional approach is to fix it with std::mutex:
Languages
Is temporary object originally const?
Is this code UB?In other words, is the (temporary) object originally const? I've looked through the standard but cannot find an answer so would appreciate quotations to relevant sections.
![Range-based for loop on a temporary range [duplicate]](https://www.developerfaqs.com/wp-content/themes/begin/img/random/5.jpg)
Languages
Range-based for loop on a temporary range [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:Thanks to some segmentation faults and warnings in valgrind, I found that this code is incorrect and has some sort of dangling reference in the for-range loop.
